samedi 12 janvier 2013

The Myth of American Meritocracy

The Myth of American Meritocracy 
How corrupt are Ivy League admissions?
By Ron Unz • November 28, 2012

Just before the Labor Day weekend, a front page New York Times story broke the news of the largest cheating scandal in Harvard University history, in which nearly half the students taking a Government course on the role of Congress had plagiarized or otherwise illegally collaborated on their final exam.1 Each year, Harvard admits just 1600 freshmen while almost 125 Harvard students now face possible suspension over this single incident. A Harvard dean described the situation as “unprecedented.”

But should we really be so surprised at this behavior among the students at America’s most prestigious academic institution? In the last generation or two, the funnel of opportunity in American society has drastically narrowed, with a greater and greater proportion of our financial, media, business, and political elites being drawn from a relatively small number of our leading universities, together with their professional schools. The rise of a Henry Ford, from farm boy mechanic to world business tycoon, seems virtually impossible today, as even America’s most successful college dropouts such as Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg often turn out to be extremely well-connected former Harvard students. Indeed, the early success of Facebook was largely due to the powerful imprimatur it enjoyed from its exclusive availability first only at Harvard and later restricted to just the Ivy League.

During this period, we have witnessed a huge national decline in well-paid middle class jobs in the manufacturing sector and other sources of employment for those lacking college degrees, with median American wages having been stagnant or declining for the last forty years. Meanwhile, there has been an astonishing concentration of wealth at the top, with America’s richest 1 percent now possessing nearly as much net wealth as the bottom 95 percent.2 This situation, sometimes described as a “winner take all society,” leaves families desperate to maximize the chances that their children will reach the winners’ circle, rather than risk failure and poverty or even merely a spot in the rapidly deteriorating middle class. And the best single means of becoming such an economic winner is to gain admission to a top university, which provides an easy ticket to the wealth of Wall Street or similar venues, whose leading firms increasingly restrict their hiring to graduates of the Ivy League or a tiny handful of other top colleges.3 On the other side, finance remains the favored employment choice for Harvard, Yale or Princeton students after the diplomas are handed out

Lire la suite de l'article

Source : The American Conservative

3 commentaires:

  1. Madame,

    SVP voir

    Traian Băsescu, expert în manipulările Roşia Montană


  2. Stimata doamna,

    Nu stiu ce varsta aveti, dar vad ca ati terminat ASE. Si eu am terminat ASE. Am cunoscut si lucrat in mai mulkte tari, dar nu mi-am permis sa balivernez, ca dv. pe subiecte pe care nu sunt stapan.
    Vorbiti, intre altele, in articolul publiocat de ca exploatarea aurului de la Rosia Montana va distruge galeriile romane.
    Stimata doamna, galeriile romane sunt distruse de pe vremea marei tereza, cand austriecii au exploatat, cu desfrnare, cveea ce se mai gasea in subso9lul Muntilotr m etaliferi din Romania.
    Apoi spuneti ca Romania nu trebuie sa-si exploateze zacamintele. De ce? canadienii, americanii, nemtii (carbune) de ce o fac. Romanii sa culeaga ciuperci din padure, spun unii. Ar fi mai ecologic, cica.
    Dv. sunteti de aceeasi parere.
    Si pt. ca presupun ca traiti in Canada, ia intrebati dv. guvernul federal sau cele regionale, ce parere au despre asa zisa dv. teorie cu privire la pastrarea natrurii si uitarea pe veci a resurselor subterane.


    Constantin Radut